GeForce 8200M G vs Quadro FX 550

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8200M G vs Quadro FX 550 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8200M G vs Quadro FX 550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8200M G

2014

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 33W instead of 189W, a 156W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quadro FX 550

2008

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌472.7% higher power demand at 189W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 8200M G is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (65 vs 64), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 8200M G is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 256 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 550 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 550 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 8200M G has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 8200M G vs Quadro FX 550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8200M G

The GeForce 8200M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 65 points.

Quadro FX 550

The Quadro FX 550 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 64 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8200M G scores 65 and the Quadro FX 550 reaches 64 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8200M G is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 550 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8200M G) vs 240 (Quadro FX 550). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8200M G) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 550).

Feature	GeForce 8200M G	Quadro FX 550
G3D Mark Score	65+2%	64
Architecture	Maxwell	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS+39%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	16	80+400%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 8200M G gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 550 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 8200M G	Quadro FX 550
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 8200M G has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 550 carries 128 MB. GeForce 8200M G gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8200M G and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 550. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8200M G) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 550) — the GeForce 8200M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 8200M G	Quadro FX 550
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB+100%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8200M G draws 33W versus the Quadro FX 550's 189W — a 140.5% difference. The GeForce 8200M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8200M G) vs 350W (Quadro FX 550). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 8200M G	Quadro FX 550
TDP	33W-83%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	2.0+567%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 8200M G came in at $0, while the Quadro FX 550 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce 8200M G was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce 8200M G) vs 0.4 (Quadro FX 550) — the GeForce 8200M G offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 8200M G (2014 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 8200M G	Quadro FX 550
MSRP	$0-100%	$150
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	0.4
Codename	GM108	GT200B
Release	March 12 2014	November 11 2008
Ranking	#854	#815

Search GeForce 8200M G on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 550 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.