
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
Popular choices:

RADEON 9800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON 9800 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2011). The RADEON 9800 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (256 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9800.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5950 Ultra and RADEON 9800

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 59 points. Launch price was $149.

RADEON 9800
The RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra scores 59 and the RADEON 9800 reaches 58 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is built on Rankine while the RADEON 9800 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9800). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9800).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 59+2% | 58 |
| Architecture | Rankine | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 2560+1233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 14.85 TFLOPS+2048% |
| ROPs | 24 | 64+167% |
| TMUs | 32 | 160+400% |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 8 MB+2005% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9800 has 128 MB. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9800) — the RADEON 9800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 8 MB+2005% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra draws 116W versus the RADEON 9800's 55W — a 71.3% difference. The RADEON 9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 350W (RADEON 9800). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 116W | 55W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 1.1+120% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the RADEON 9800 launched at $399 and now averages $399. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra costs 100+% less ($399 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9800) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The RADEON 9800 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.1 |
| Codename | GF116 | Strix Halo |
| Release | March 15 2011 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #761 | #98 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















