
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

Radeon X1300
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs Radeon X1300 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs Radeon X1300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs Radeon X1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌16% higher power demand at 116W vs 100W.
- ❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.
Radeon X1300
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1300 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 116W, a 16W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs Radeon X1300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 59 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon X1300
The Radeon X1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra scores 59 and the Radeon X1300 reaches 58 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is built on Rankine while the Radeon X1300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 1,408 (Radeon X1300). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon X1300).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 59+2% | 58 |
| Architecture | Rankine | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 1408+633% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 4.632 TFLOPS+570% |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 32 | 88+175% |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 1.5 MB+295% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra and 64-bit on the Radeon X1300. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon X1300) — the Radeon X1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 1.5 MB+295% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra draws 116W versus the Radeon X1300's 100W — a 14.8% difference. The Radeon X1300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 350W (Radeon X1300). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 116W | 100W-14% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 0.6+20% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra came in at $0, while the Radeon X1300 launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5950 Ultra was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 0.6 (Radeon X1300) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1300 (2020 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.6 |
| Codename | GF116 | Navi 14 |
| Release | March 15 2011 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #761 | #336 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














