GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs Radeon Xpress 1300

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs Radeon Xpress 1300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs Radeon Xpress 1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

2011

Why buy it

✅+13.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌36.5% higher power demand at 116W vs 85W.

Radeon Xpress 1300

2020

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Xpress 1300 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 85W instead of 116W, a 31W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (52 vs 59).
❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 13.5% in PassMark G3D (59 vs 52), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Xpress 1300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Xpress 1300 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs Radeon Xpress 1300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 59 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon Xpress 1300

The Radeon Xpress 1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra scores 59 versus the Radeon Xpress 1300's 52 — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra leads by 13.5%. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is built on Rankine while the Radeon Xpress 1300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 4.224 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300).

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	Radeon Xpress 1300
G3D Mark Score	59+13%	52
Architecture	Rankine	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	192	1280+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	4.224 TFLOPS+511%
ROPs	24	32+33%
TMUs	32	80+150%
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	2 MB+426%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Xpress 1300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	Radeon Xpress 1300
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Xpress 1300 carries 512 MB. Radeon Xpress 1300 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra and 64-bit on the Radeon Xpress 1300. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300) — the Radeon Xpress 1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	Radeon Xpress 1300
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	2 MB+426%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 9.0c (Radeon Xpress 1300). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	Radeon Xpress 1300
DirectX	9.0a	9.0c
OpenGL	1.5	2.0+33%
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra draws 116W versus the Radeon Xpress 1300's 85W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon Xpress 1300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	Radeon Xpress 1300
TDP	116W	85W-27%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C	75
Perf/Watt	0.5	0.6+20%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra came in at $0, while the Radeon Xpress 1300 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs Infinity (Radeon Xpress 1300) — the Radeon Xpress 1300 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Xpress 1300 (2020 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	Radeon Xpress 1300
MSRP	$0	$0
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	Infinity
Codename	GF116	Navi 14
Release	March 15 2011	August 4 2020
Ranking	#761	#351

Search GeForce FX 5950 Ultra on Amazon

Search Radeon Xpress 1300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.