FirePro 2450 vs GeForce Go 7300
FirePro 2450
Popular choices:
GeForce Go 7300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce Go 7300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 2450.
| Insight | FirePro 2450 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 7300 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 2450 and GeForce Go 7300
FirePro 2450
The FirePro 2450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.
GeForce Go 7300
The GeForce Go 7300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 2450 scores 51 and the GeForce Go 7300 reaches 52 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 2450 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce Go 7300 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (FirePro 2450) vs 384 (GeForce Go 7300). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro 2450) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7300).
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 51 | 52+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5491 TFLOPS | 0.7626 TFLOPS+39% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB+200% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 2450) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7300). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1+12% | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.3+57% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD (FirePro 2450) vs No (GeForce Go 7300). Decoder: UVD vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 2450) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7300).
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD | No |
| Decoder | UVD | PureVideo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 2450 draws 150W versus the GeForce Go 7300's 64W — a 80.4% difference. The GeForce Go 7300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2450) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 170mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 64W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 170mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-20% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 0.8+167% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce Go 7300 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | — |
| Codename | Opal | GK107 |
| Release | October 16 2013 | May 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #879 | #777 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 2450 and GeForce Go 7300
