FirePro 2450 vs GeForce FX 5950 Ultra Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 2450 vs GeForce FX 5950 Ultra FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 2450 vs GeForce FX 5950 Ultra: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 2450
2013Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Measures 170mm instead of 229mm, a 59mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (51 vs 59).
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌29.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 116W.
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
2011Why buy it
- ✅+15.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Draws 116W instead of 150W, a 34W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌34.7% longer card at 229mm vs 170mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 2450 vs GeForce FX 5950 Ultra Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 2450
The FirePro 2450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 59 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro 2450 scores 51 versus the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra's 59 — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra leads by 15.7%. The FirePro 2450 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra uses Rankine, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro 2450) vs 192 (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro 2450) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra).
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 51 | 59+16% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5491 TFLOPS | 0.6912 TFLOPS+26% |
| ROPs | 8 | 24+200% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 256 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro 2450 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 2450 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra carries 256 MB. FirePro 2450 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2450 and 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro 2450) vs 384 KB (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 2450) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1+12% | 9.0a |
| OpenGL | 3.3+120% | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 2450 draws 150W versus the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra's 116W — a 25.6% difference. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2450) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 170mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 116W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 170mm | 229mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-20% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 0.5+67% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 2450 came in at $0, while the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro 2450) vs Infinity (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 2450 (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Opal | GF116 |
| Release | October 16 2013 | March 15 2011 |
| Ranking | #879 | #761 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















