
FirePro 2450

Radeon 2100
FirePro 2450 vs Radeon 2100 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 2450 vs Radeon 2100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 2450 vs Radeon 2100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 2450
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (51 vs 60).
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
Radeon 2100
2019Why buy it
- ✅+17.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅FirePro 2450 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 2100 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 2450 vs Radeon 2100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 2450
The FirePro 2450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

Radeon 2100
The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro 2450 scores 51 versus the Radeon 2100's 60 — the Radeon 2100 leads by 17.6%. The FirePro 2450 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon 2100 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (FirePro 2450) vs 384 (Radeon 2100). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro 2450) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100).
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 51 | 60+18% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5491 TFLOPS | 0.7864 TFLOPS+43% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2450 and 64-bit on the Radeon 2100. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro 2450) vs 128 KB (Radeon 2100) — the FirePro 2450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 2450) vs 9.0b (Radeon 2100). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1+12% | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 3.3+65% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD (FirePro 2450) vs Avivo (Radeon 2100). Decoder: UVD vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 2450) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon 2100).
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD | Avivo |
| Decoder | UVD | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 2450 draws 150W versus the Radeon 2100's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2450) vs 350W (Radeon 2100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 1.2+300% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 2450 came in at $0, while the Radeon 2100 launched at $149. On MSRP, FirePro 2450 was 100+% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro 2450) vs 0.4 (Radeon 2100) — the FirePro 2450 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 2100 (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $149 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.4 |
| Codename | Opal | Polaris 24 |
| Release | October 16 2013 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #879 | #898 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














