FirePro 2450 vs RADEON E2400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 2450 vs RADEON E2400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro 2450 vs RADEON E2400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 2450

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

RADEON E2400

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON E2400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (52 vs 51), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro 2450 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON E2400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON E2400 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro 2450 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 2450 vs RADEON E2400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 2450

The FirePro 2450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

RADEON E2400

The RADEON E2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 2450 scores 51 and the RADEON E2400 reaches 52 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 2450 is built on GCN 1.0 while the RADEON E2400 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro 2450) vs 384 (RADEON E2400). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro 2450) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (RADEON E2400).

Feature	FirePro 2450	RADEON E2400
G3D Mark Score	51	52+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5491 TFLOPS	0.9085 TFLOPS+65%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	96 KB	96 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro 2450	RADEON E2400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2450 and 64-bit on the RADEON E2400. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro 2450) vs 512 KB (RADEON E2400) — the RADEON E2400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro 2450	RADEON E2400
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 2450 draws 150W versus the RADEON E2400's 50W — a 100% difference. The RADEON E2400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2450) vs 350W (RADEON E2400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	FirePro 2450	RADEON E2400
TDP	150W	50W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	170mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	60°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.3	1.0+233%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 2450 came in at $0, while the RADEON E2400 launched at $100. On MSRP, FirePro 2450 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro 2450) vs 0.5 (RADEON E2400) — the FirePro 2450 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON E2400 (2017 vs 2013).

Feature	FirePro 2450	RADEON E2400
MSRP	$0-100%	$100
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	0.5
Codename	Opal	Lexa
Release	October 16 2013	April 20 2017
Ranking	#879	#773

Search FirePro 2450 on Amazon

Search RADEON E2400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.