Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro 2450 vs RADEON X550XT

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro 2450

2013Core: 715 MHz
Similar parts
······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

RADEON X550XT

2019Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1218 MHz
Buy on Amazon

FirePro 2450 vs RADEON X550XT Performance Spectrum

FirePro 2450
0.5 GB 150
51
0.0%
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 9700
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON X300
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700
brand logoMobility Radeon X1400
brand logoRadeon HD 7950 / R9 280
brand logoRadeon R9 Fury
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700
RADEON X550XT
0.5 GB 50
56
+9.8%
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 9550
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 9600
brand logoMobility Radeon X1400
brand logoMobility Radeon X2300 HD
brand logoRadeon RX 560X (móvel)
brand logoRadeon R9 Fury
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 2450 vs RADEON X550XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 2450

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (51 vs 56).
  • ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

RADEON X550XT

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅+9.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅FirePro 2450 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X550XT is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 168mm instead of 170mm, a 2mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON X550XT is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 9.8% in PassMark G3D (56 vs 51), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON X550XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON X550XT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro 2450 vs RADEON X550XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 2450

The FirePro 2450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

AMD

RADEON X550XT

The RADEON X550XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 56 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro 2450 scores 51 versus the RADEON X550XT's 56 — the RADEON X550XT leads by 9.8%. The FirePro 2450 is built on GCN 1.0 while the RADEON X550XT uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro 2450) vs 512 (RADEON X550XT). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro 2450) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (RADEON X550XT).

FeatureFirePro 2450RADEON X550XT
G3D Mark Score
51
56+10%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5491 TFLOPS
1.247 TFLOPS+127%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
32+33%
L1 Cache
96 KB
128 KB+33%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 2450RADEON X550XT
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2450 and 64-bit on the RADEON X550XT. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro 2450) vs 512 KB (RADEON X550XT) — the RADEON X550XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 2450RADEON X550XT
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 2450) vs 9.0b (RADEON X550XT). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro 2450RADEON X550XT
DirectX
10.1+12%
9.0b
OpenGL
3.3+65%
2.0
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD (FirePro 2450) vs None (RADEON X550XT). Decoder: UVD vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 2450) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON X550XT).

FeatureFirePro 2450RADEON X550XT
Encoder
UVD
None
Decoder
UVD
None
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 2450 draws 150W versus the RADEON X550XT's 50W — a 100% difference. The RADEON X550XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2450) vs 350W (RADEON X550XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 170mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 65.

FeatureFirePro 2450RADEON X550XT
TDP
150W
50W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
170mm
168mm
Height
69mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
60°C-8%
65
Perf/Watt
0.3
1.1+267%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 2450 came in at $0, while the RADEON X550XT launched at $50. On MSRP, FirePro 2450 was 100+% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro 2450) vs 1.1 (RADEON X550XT) — the FirePro 2450 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X550XT (2019 vs 2013).

FeatureFirePro 2450RADEON X550XT
MSRP
$0-100%
$50
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
1.1
Codename
Opal
Lexa
Release
October 16 2013
March 27 2019
Ranking
#879
#772
Search FirePro 2450 on AmazonSearch RADEON X550XT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.