FirePro 2450 vs Radeon X1300

FirePro 2450

2013Core: 715 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
AMD

Radeon X1300

2020Core: 1327 MHzBoost: 1645 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro 2450 vs Radeon X1300 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 2450 vs Radeon X1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 2450

2013

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (51 vs 58).
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Radeon X1300

2020

Why buy it

  • +13.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • FirePro 2450 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1300 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
  • Measures 168mm instead of 170mm, a 2mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon X1300 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 13.7% in PassMark G3D (58 vs 51), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon X1300 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro 2450 vs Radeon X1300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 2450

The FirePro 2450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

AMD

Radeon X1300

The Radeon X1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro 2450 scores 51 versus the Radeon X1300's 58 — the Radeon X1300 leads by 13.7%. The FirePro 2450 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon X1300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro 2450) vs 1,408 (Radeon X1300). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro 2450) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon X1300).

FeatureFirePro 2450Radeon X1300
G3D Mark Score
51
58+14%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
384
1408+267%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5491 TFLOPS
4.632 TFLOPS+744%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
88+267%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1.5 MB+500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 2450Radeon X1300
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 2450 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1300 carries 256 MB. FirePro 2450 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2450 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1300. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro 2450) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon X1300) — the Radeon X1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 2450Radeon X1300
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1.5 MB+500%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 2450) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro 2450Radeon X1300
DirectX
10.1+12%
9_0c
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD (FirePro 2450) vs Avivo (Radeon X1300). Decoder: UVD vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 2450) vs H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 (Radeon X1300).

FeatureFirePro 2450Radeon X1300
Encoder
UVD
Avivo
Decoder
UVD
Avivo
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 2450 draws 150W versus the Radeon X1300's 100W — a 40% difference. The Radeon X1300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2450) vs 350W (Radeon X1300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureFirePro 2450Radeon X1300
TDP
150W
100W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
170mm
168mm
Height
69mm
69mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
60°C
Perf/Watt
0.3
0.6+100%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 2450 came in at $0, while the Radeon X1300 launched at $100. On MSRP, FirePro 2450 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro 2450) vs 0.6 (Radeon X1300) — the FirePro 2450 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1300 (2020 vs 2013).

FeatureFirePro 2450Radeon X1300
MSRP
$0-100%
$100
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
0.6
Codename
Opal
Navi 14
Release
October 16 2013
May 28 2020
Ranking
#879
#336

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.