
FirePro 2450

Radeon X1300
FirePro 2450 vs Radeon X1300 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 2450 vs Radeon X1300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 2450 vs Radeon X1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 2450
2013Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (51 vs 58).
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
Radeon X1300
2020Why buy it
- ✅+13.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅FirePro 2450 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1300 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 170mm, a 2mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 2450 vs Radeon X1300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 2450
The FirePro 2450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

Radeon X1300
The Radeon X1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro 2450 scores 51 versus the Radeon X1300's 58 — the Radeon X1300 leads by 13.7%. The FirePro 2450 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon X1300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro 2450) vs 1,408 (Radeon X1300). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro 2450) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon X1300).
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 51 | 58+14% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1408+267% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5491 TFLOPS | 4.632 TFLOPS+744% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 88+267% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1.5 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 2450 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1300 carries 256 MB. FirePro 2450 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2450 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1300. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro 2450) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon X1300) — the Radeon X1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1.5 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 2450) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1+12% | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD (FirePro 2450) vs Avivo (Radeon X1300). Decoder: UVD vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 2450) vs H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 (Radeon X1300).
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD | Avivo |
| Decoder | UVD | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 2450 draws 150W versus the Radeon X1300's 100W — a 40% difference. The Radeon X1300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2450) vs 350W (Radeon X1300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 100W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | 168mm |
| Height | 69mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 0.6+100% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 2450 came in at $0, while the Radeon X1300 launched at $100. On MSRP, FirePro 2450 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro 2450) vs 0.6 (Radeon X1300) — the FirePro 2450 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1300 (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.6 |
| Codename | Opal | Navi 14 |
| Release | October 16 2013 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #879 | #336 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














