FirePro 2450 vs Radeon X1600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 2450 vs Radeon X1600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 2450 vs Radeon X1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 2450
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 255W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon X1600
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅FirePro 2450 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1600 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 170mm, a 2mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌70% higher power demand at 255W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 2450 vs Radeon X1600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 2450
The FirePro 2450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

Radeon X1600
The Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2105 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 2450 scores 51 and the Radeon X1600 reaches 49 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 2450 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon X1600 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro 2450) vs 4,608 (Radeon X1600). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro 2450) vs 19.4 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600).
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 51+4% | 49 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 4608+1100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5491 TFLOPS | 19.4 TFLOPS+3433% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 24 | 288+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2450 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 2450) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1+12% | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD (FirePro 2450) vs Avivo (Radeon X1600). Decoder: UVD vs Avivo.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD | Avivo |
| Decoder | UVD | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 2450 draws 150W versus the Radeon X1600's 255W — a 51.9% difference. The FirePro 2450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2450) vs 350W (Radeon X1600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-41% | 255W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | 168mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3+50% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 2450 came in at $0, while the Radeon X1600 launched at $199. On MSRP, FirePro 2450 was 100+% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro 2450) vs 0.2 (Radeon X1600) — the FirePro 2450 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1600 (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.2 |
| Codename | Opal | Navi 21 |
| Release | October 16 2013 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #879 | #34 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















