FirePro 2450 vs Radeon X1600

FirePro 2450

2013Core: 715 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon X1600

2020Boost: 2105 MHz

FirePro 2450 vs Radeon X1600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 2450 vs Radeon X1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 2450

2013

Why buy it

  • Draws 150W instead of 255W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Radeon X1600

2020

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • FirePro 2450 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1600 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Measures 168mm instead of 170mm, a 2mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 70% higher power demand at 255W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro 2450 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.1% in PassMark G3D (51 vs 49), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon X1600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. FirePro 2450 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro 2450 vs Radeon X1600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 2450

The FirePro 2450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

AMD

Radeon X1600

The Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2105 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 2450 scores 51 and the Radeon X1600 reaches 49 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 2450 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon X1600 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro 2450) vs 4,608 (Radeon X1600). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro 2450) vs 19.4 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600).

FeatureFirePro 2450Radeon X1600
G3D Mark Score
51+4%
49
Architecture
GCN 1.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
384
4608+1100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5491 TFLOPS
19.4 TFLOPS+3433%
ROPs
8
64+700%
TMUs
24
288+1100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 2450Radeon X1600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2450 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600.

FeatureFirePro 2450Radeon X1600
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 2450) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro 2450Radeon X1600
DirectX
10.1+12%
9_0c
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD (FirePro 2450) vs Avivo (Radeon X1600). Decoder: UVD vs Avivo.

FeatureFirePro 2450Radeon X1600
Encoder
UVD
Avivo
Decoder
UVD
Avivo
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 2450 draws 150W versus the Radeon X1600's 255W — a 51.9% difference. The FirePro 2450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2450) vs 350W (Radeon X1600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureFirePro 2450Radeon X1600
TDP
150W-41%
255W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
170mm
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
60°C
Perf/Watt
0.3+50%
0.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 2450 came in at $0, while the Radeon X1600 launched at $199. On MSRP, FirePro 2450 was 100+% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro 2450) vs 0.2 (Radeon X1600) — the FirePro 2450 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1600 (2020 vs 2013).

FeatureFirePro 2450Radeon X1600
MSRP
$0-100%
$199
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
0.2
Codename
Opal
Navi 21
Release
October 16 2013
October 28 2020
Ranking
#879
#34

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.