FirePro 2450 vs MOBILITY RADEON X600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 2450 vs MOBILITY RADEON X600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 2450 vs MOBILITY RADEON X600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 2450
2013Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
MOBILITY RADEON X600
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 2450 vs MOBILITY RADEON X600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 2450
The FirePro 2450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

MOBILITY RADEON X600
The MOBILITY RADEON X600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 50 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 2450 scores 51 and the MOBILITY RADEON X600 reaches 50 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 2450 is built on GCN 1.0 while the MOBILITY RADEON X600 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro 2450) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X600). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro 2450) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X600).
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | MOBILITY RADEON X600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 51+2% | 50 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5491 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+104% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB+20% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | MOBILITY RADEON X600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 2450 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON X600 carries 128 MB. FirePro 2450 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2450 and 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON X600.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | MOBILITY RADEON X600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 2450) vs 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON X600). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | MOBILITY RADEON X600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1+12% | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 3.3+65% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD (FirePro 2450) vs None (MOBILITY RADEON X600). Decoder: UVD vs Video Shader. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 2450) vs MPEG-2 (MOBILITY RADEON X600).
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | MOBILITY RADEON X600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD | None |
| Decoder | UVD | Video Shader |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 2450 draws 150W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X600's 50W — a 100% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2450) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 75.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | MOBILITY RADEON X600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-20% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 1.0+233% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 2450 came in at $0, while the MOBILITY RADEON X600 launched at $50. On MSRP, FirePro 2450 was 100+% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro 2450) vs 1.0 (MOBILITY RADEON X600) — the FirePro 2450 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 2450 (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | MOBILITY RADEON X600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 1.0 |
| Codename | Opal | Broadway |
| Release | October 16 2013 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #879 | #846 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















