FirePro 2450 vs RADEON 9800

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 2450 vs RADEON 9800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro 2450 vs RADEON 9800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 2450

2013

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (51 vs 58).
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌172.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 55W.

RADEON 9800

2025

Why buy it

✅+13.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 55W instead of 150W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON 9800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 13.7% in PassMark G3D (58 vs 51), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 40 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 9800 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro 2450 vs RADEON 9800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 2450

The FirePro 2450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

RADEON 9800

The RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro 2450 scores 51 versus the RADEON 9800's 58 — the RADEON 9800 leads by 13.7%. The FirePro 2450 is built on GCN 1.0 while the RADEON 9800 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro 2450) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9800). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro 2450) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9800).

Feature	FirePro 2450	RADEON 9800
G3D Mark Score	51	58+14%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	384	2560+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5491 TFLOPS	14.85 TFLOPS+2604%
ROPs	8	64+700%
TMUs	24	160+567%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro 2450	RADEON 9800
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 2450 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9800 carries 128 MB. FirePro 2450 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2450 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9800. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro 2450) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9800) — the RADEON 9800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro 2450	RADEON 9800
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 2450 draws 150W versus the RADEON 9800's 55W — a 92.7% difference. The RADEON 9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2450) vs 350W (RADEON 9800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	FirePro 2450	RADEON 9800
TDP	150W	55W-63%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	170mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	60°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.3	1.1+267%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 2450 came in at $0, while the RADEON 9800 launched at $399. On MSRP, FirePro 2450 was 100+% cheaper ($399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro 2450) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9800) — the FirePro 2450 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9800 (2025 vs 2013).

Feature	FirePro 2450	RADEON 9800
MSRP	$0-100%	$399
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	0.1
Codename	Opal	Strix Halo
Release	October 16 2013	January 6 2025
Ranking	#879	#98

Search FirePro 2450 on Amazon

Search RADEON 9800 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.