RADEON X700
AMD
G3D Mark
73
MSRP
$149
AVG Price
$10
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Overview
The RADEON X700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 73 points.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X700
FPS Benchmarks
Predicted performance for RADEON X700 across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 7800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Counter-Strike 2
Dead by Daylight
Delta Force
Euro Truck Simulator 2
Final Fantasy XIV
Hearts of Iron IV
League of Legends
Monster Hunter Wilds
Path of Exile 2
Project Zomboid
Technical Analysis
Detailed breakdown of RADEON X700 specifications and capabilities.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON X700 scores 73 in the G3D Mark benchmark (the standard measure of rasterization GPU performance), placing it in the Entry Level tier as a Aging generation graphics card. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) architecture (codename: Navi 22), manufactured on a 7 nm process— smaller process nodes improve power efficiency and transistor density. It packs 2304 shader units (the primary compute units for rendering pixels), 144 TMUs (texture mapping units), and 64 ROPs (render output units that handle final pixel output). Raw FP32 compute power: 11.29 TFLOPS — this measures the theoretical peak floating-point performance. Boost clock reaches 2450 MHz from a base of 1941 MHz.
| Specification | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|
| G3D MarkPassMark 3D graphics benchmark score | 73 |
| ArchitectureGPU microarchitecture generation | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) |
| CodenameInternal GPU die codename | Navi 22 |
| Manufacturing ProcessFabrication node — smaller = more efficient | 7 nm |
| Shader UnitsCore compute units for rendering/compute | 2304 |
| TMUsTexture Mapping Units — handle texture sampling | 144 |
| ROPsRender Output Units — final pixel/color blending | 64 |
| Boost ClockMaximum GPU frequency under load | 2450 MHz |
| Base ClockGuaranteed minimum GPU frequency | 1941 MHz |
| Compute (FP32)Peak single-precision floating-point performance | 11.29 TFLOPS |
| Texture Fill RateTextures processed per second | 352.8 GTexel/s |
| PCIe InterfaceCPU↔GPU data link generation | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Transistor Count | 17,200 million |
| Performance RankPosition in global GPU performance ranking | #90 |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X700 is equipped with 0.25 GB of GDDR5 video memory connected via a 64-bit memory bus. Memory operates at 8 Gbps effective speed.
| Specification | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|
| VRAM SizeVideo memory capacity — more = better for high-res textures | 0.25 GB |
| VRAM TypeMemory technology generation | GDDR5 |
| Memory BusWidth of data path — wider = more bandwidth | 64-bit |
| Memory SpeedEffective memory data rate | 8 Gbps |
| L1 Cache | 512 kB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB |
Advanced Features & APIs
The RADEON X700 supports modern upscaling and frame generation technologies: Radeon Super Resolution — these can dramatically boost effective FPS by generating intermediate frames or upscaling from lower internal resolution.
| Specification | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|
| Radeon Super Resolution | ✅ Supported |
Display & Media
Display outputs: .
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X700 draws 175 Watt under load (TDP) — a 350W PSU minimum is recommended. Power connector: Legacy.
| Specification | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|
| TDPPower consumption under load | 175 Watt |
| Recommended PSUMinimum power supply wattage | 350W |
| Power ConnectorRequired PCIe power cable type | Legacy |
Value Analysis
At an average price of $10 (MSRP: $149), the RADEON X700 delivers 7 G3D Mark points per dollar. Overall performance ranking position: #90 among all indexed GPUs.
| Specification | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|
| MSRPManufacturer's Suggested Retail Price | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d)Average market price over the last 30 days | $10 |
| Performance RankPosition in global GPU performance ranking | #90 |
| Release Date | June 9 2021 |
| Release Year | 2021 |
Specifications Reference
Raw spec sheet for quick lookup. The analysis cards above explain what these fields mean in practice.
2 categories
Technical Specifications
22 specs
Technical Specifications
22 specs
| ROPs | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 |
| Vram | 0.25 GB |
| L0 Cache | 576 kB |
| L1 Cache | 512 kB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB |
| L3 Cache | 80 MB |
| Core Clock | 1941 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2450 MHz |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| Memory Speed | 8 Gbps |
| Shading Units | 2304 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Memory Bus Width | 64-bit |
| Transistor Count | 17,200 million |
| Frame Generation | Radeon Super Resolution: Yes |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 |
| Texture Fill Rate | 352.8 |
| Manufacturing Process | 7 nm |
| Driver Upscaling Tech | Radeon Super Resolution (RSR) |
| Power Consumption (TDP) | 175 Watt |
| Floating Point Performance | 11.29 TFLOPS |
General Information
4 specs
General Information
4 specs
| Codename | Navi 22 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) |
| Release Date | June 9 2021 |
| Performance Ranking Position | 90 |
Similar Performance
Graphics cards with benchmark scores closest to the current hardware, grouped by manufacturer.
NVIDIA (8)
AMD (8)
Our Recommendation for RADEON X700
Suggested pairings based on performance balance
Minimum (Avoid Bottleneck) (12)
Recommended (Balanced) (12)
High-End (Max Performance) (12)
Popular Comparisons
Compare RADEON X700 with other popular GPUs
Compare RADEON X700
See how this GPU stacks up against similar alternatives
Better Alternatives (8)
Similar or Lower Performance (8)
