GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON X700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON X700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON X700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅3383.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 10679.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 175W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

RADEON X700

2021

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌133.3% higher power demand at 175W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3383.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 10679.5% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 73), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $149 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 10679.5% (52.8 vs 0.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON X700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RADEON X700

The RADEON X700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 73 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RADEON X700's 73 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 10679.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RADEON X700 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,304 (RADEON X700). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (RADEON X700). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2450 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON X700
G3D Mark Score	7,869+10679%	73
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	896	2304+157%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	11.29 TFLOPS+278%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2450 MHz+47%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	144+157%
L1 Cache	896 KB+75%	512 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	3 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON X700
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON X700 carries 256 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the RADEON X700. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3 MB (RADEON X700) — the RADEON X700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON X700
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+1500%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	3 MB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RADEON X700's 175W — a 80% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (RADEON X700). Power connectors: None vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON X700
TDP	75W-57%	175W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Legacy
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+26125%	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the RADEON X700 launched at $149. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5 (RADEON X700) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 10460% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X700 (2021 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON X700
MSRP	$149	$149
Performance per Dollar	52.8+10460%	0.5
Codename	TU117	Navi 22
Release	April 23 2019	June 9 2021
Ranking	#323	#90

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search RADEON X700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.