Arc A530M vs GeForce GTX 1650

Intel

Arc A530M

2023Core: 900 MHzBoost: 1300 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······

Arc A530M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A530M vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A530M vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A530M

2023

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 65W instead of 75W, a 10W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • 14.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 15.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Arc A530M instead at 8,013 vs 7,869, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A530M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 12nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A530M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A530M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A530M

The Arc A530M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 1 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,013 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A530M scores 8,013 and the GeForce GTX 1650 reaches 7,869 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A530M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Arc A530M) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 3.994 TFLOPS (Arc A530M) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1300 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureArc A530MGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
8,013+2%
7,869
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Turing
Process Node
6 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1536+71%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.994 TFLOPS+34%
2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1665 MHz+28%
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
96+71%
56
L2 Cache
8 MB+700%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A530M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureArc A530MGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Arc A530M) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 75% advantage for the Arc A530M. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Arc A530M and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc A530M) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Arc A530M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A530MGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s+75%
128 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
8 MB+700%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A530M) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureArc A530MGeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12.2+2%
12
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A530M) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A530M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureArc A530MGeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A530M draws 65W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 14.3% difference. The Arc A530M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A530M) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

FeatureArc A530MGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
65W-13%
75W
Recommended PSU
500W
300W-40%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
0mm
229mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
70°C-13%
Perf/Watt
123.3+18%
104.9
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A530M (2023 vs 2019).

FeatureArc A530MGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$149
Codename
DG2-256
TU117
Release
August 1 2023
April 23 2019
Ranking
#317
#323

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.