
Arc A530M vs GeForce GTX Titan

Arc A530M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX Titan
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc A530M is positioned at rank #243 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A530M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc A530M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The Arc A530M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX Titan lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX Titan is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A530M.
| Insight | Arc A530M | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX Titan remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A530M and GeForce GTX Titan

Arc A530M
The Arc A530M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 1 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,013 points.

GeForce GTX Titan
The GeForce GTX Titan is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 19 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,181 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A530M scores 8,013 and the GeForce GTX Titan reaches 8,181 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A530M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX Titan uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Arc A530M) vs 2,688 (GeForce GTX Titan). Raw compute: 3.994 TFLOPS (Arc A530M) vs 4.709 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX Titan). Boost clocks: 1300 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A530M | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,013 | 8,181+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2688+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.994 TFLOPS | 4.709 TFLOPS+18% |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz+48% | 876 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 96 | 224+133% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+433% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A530M | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A530M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX Titan has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX Titan offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Arc A530M) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX Titan) — a 28.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX Titan. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc A530M) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX Titan) — the Arc A530M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A530M | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 288 GB/s+29% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+433% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A530M) vs 12 (GeForce GTX Titan). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A530M | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A530M) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX Titan). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A530M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX Titan).
| Feature | Arc A530M | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A530M draws 65W versus the GeForce GTX Titan's 250W — a 117.5% difference. The Arc A530M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A530M) vs 600W (GeForce GTX Titan). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc A530M | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-74% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 123.3+277% | 32.7 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A530M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | Arc A530M | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $70 |
| Codename | DG2-256 | GK110 |
| Release | August 1 2023 | February 19 2013 |
| Ranking | #317 | #311 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















