Arc A530M vs Radeon R9 290 / 390

Intel

Arc A530M

2023Core: 900 MHzBoost: 1300 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 290 / 390

2015Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Arc A530M vs Radeon R9 290 / 390 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A530M vs Radeon R9 290 / 390 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A530M vs Radeon R9 290 / 390: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A530M

2023

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 65W instead of 300W, a 235W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 290 / 390 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Radeon R9 290 / 390

2015

Why buy it

  • 23.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 361.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 290 / 390 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (8,150 vs 8,013), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A530M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 290 / 390 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 290 / 390 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A530M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A530M vs Radeon R9 290 / 390 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A530M

The Arc A530M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 1 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,013 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 290 / 390

The Radeon R9 290 / 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,150 points. Launch price was $329.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A530M scores 8,013 and the Radeon R9 290 / 390 reaches 8,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A530M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon R9 290 / 390 uses GCN 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Arc A530M) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Raw compute: 3.994 TFLOPS (Arc A530M) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Boost clocks: 1300 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureArc A530MRadeon R9 290 / 390
G3D Mark Score
8,013
8,150+2%
Architecture
Generation 12.7
GCN 2.0
Process Node
6 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536
2560+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.994 TFLOPS
5.12 TFLOPS+28%
Boost Clock
1300 MHz+30%
1000 MHz
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
96
160+67%
L2 Cache
8 MB+700%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc A530MRadeon R9 290 / 390
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Arc A530M) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon R9 290 / 390) — a 42.9% advantage for the Radeon R9 290 / 390. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Arc A530M and 512-bit on the Radeon R9 290 / 390. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc A530M) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290 / 390) — the Arc A530M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A530MRadeon R9 290 / 390
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
320 GB/s+43%
Bus Width
128-bit
512-bit+300%
L2 Cache
8 MB+700%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A530M) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureArc A530MRadeon R9 290 / 390
DirectX
12.2+2%
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A530M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A530M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290 / 390).

FeatureArc A530MRadeon R9 290 / 390
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
VCE 2.0
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A530M draws 65W versus the Radeon R9 290 / 390's 300W — a 128.8% difference. The Arc A530M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A530M) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 275mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 95°C.

FeatureArc A530MRadeon R9 290 / 390
TDP
65W-78%
300W
Recommended PSU
500W-33%
750W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
0mm
275mm
Height
0mm
109mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C-16%
95°C
Perf/Watt
123.3+353%
27.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A530M (2023 vs 2015).

FeatureArc A530MRadeon R9 290 / 390
MSRP
$329
Codename
DG2-256
Grenada
Release
August 1 2023
June 18 2015
Ranking
#317
#296

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.