G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 780 vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 780 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 780

2013

Why buy it

✅16.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
234.9% HIGHER MSRP
$499 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 231.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 15.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅GeForce GTX 780 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 780 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 16.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (7,957 vs 7,869), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $350 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 231.2% (52.8 vs 15.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX 780 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 780 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 780

The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 780 scores 7,957 and the GeForce GTX 1650 reaches 7,869 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	7,957+1%	7,869
Architecture	Kepler	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2304+157%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.156 TFLOPS+39%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	900 MHz	1665 MHz+85%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	192+243%	56
L1 Cache	192 KB	896 KB+367%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 780	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 780 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 780 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s+125%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	384-bit+200%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Vulkan	1.0	1.4+40%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 780) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce GTX 780	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	NVDEC 1st Gen	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 780 draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	250W	75W-70%
Recommended PSU	600W	300W-50%
Power Connector	6-pin + 8-pin	None
Length	267mm	229mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80	70°C-13%
Perf/Watt	31.8	104.9+230%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 780 came in at $499, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 70.1% cheaper ($350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.9 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 232.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 780	GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP	$499	$149-70%
Performance per Dollar	15.9	52.8+232%
Codename	GK110	TU117
Release	May 23 2013	April 23 2019
Ranking	#320	#323

Search GeForce GTX 780 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.