
GeForce GTX 780

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
GeForce GTX 780 vs Radeon Pro 5500 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 780 vs Radeon Pro 5500 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 780 vs Radeon Pro 5500 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 780
2013Why buy it
- ✅37.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌150.8% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 250W vs 125W.
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 149.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 15.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 250W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 780 vs Radeon Pro 5500 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 780
The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,910 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 scores 7,957 and the Radeon Pro 5500 XT reaches 7,910 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780) vs 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1757 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,957 | 7,910 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+50% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS | 5.398 TFLOPS+30% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1757 MHz+95% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+100% | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 780 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 780 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 780 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5500 XT. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5500 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.4+40% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 780) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro 5500 XT's 125W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 125W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.8 | 63.3+99% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 780 came in at $499, while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 5500 XT was 60.1% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.9 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 39.7 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5500 XT offers 149.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 5500 XT (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $199-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.9 | 39.7+150% |
| Codename | GK110 | Navi 14 |
| Release | May 23 2013 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #320 | #322 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















