
GeForce GTX 780 vs Radeon Pro 5500 XT

GeForce GTX 780
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The Radeon Pro 5500 XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 780 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 780 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 5500 XT.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 780 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $35 versus $100 for the Radeon Pro 5500 XT, it costs 65% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 187.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+187.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($35) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 and Radeon Pro 5500 XT

GeForce GTX 780
The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,910 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 scores 7,957 and the Radeon Pro 5500 XT reaches 7,910 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780) vs 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1757 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,957 | 7,910 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+50% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS | 5.398 TFLOPS+30% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1757 MHz+95% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+100% | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 780 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 780 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5500 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.4+40% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 780) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro 5500 XT's 125W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 125W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.8 | 63.3+99% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 780 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT launched at $199 and now averages $100. The GeForce GTX 780 costs 65% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 227.3 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 79.1 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) — the GeForce GTX 780 offers 187.4% better value. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $199-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35-65% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 227.3+187% | 79.1 |
| Codename | GK110 | Navi 14 |
| Release | May 23 2013 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #320 | #322 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















