GeForce GTX 780 vs Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
GeForce GTX 780
Popular choices:
Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 780 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 780.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 780 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 and Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
GeForce GTX 780
The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.
Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,119 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 scores 7,957 and the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design reaches 8,119 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 is built on Kepler while the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780) vs 5.599 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1215 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,957 | 8,119+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS | 5.599 TFLOPS+35% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1215 MHz+35% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 192+33% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 2.3 MB+1111% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of video memory. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design) — the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 780) vs NVENC 7th Gen (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780) vs H.265,H.264 (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 draws 250W versus the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design's 60W — a 122.6% difference. The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs Unknown.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 60W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | Unknown-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 31.8 | 135.3+325% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35 | — |
| Codename | GK110 | TU106 |
| Release | May 23 2013 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #320 | #313 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 780 and Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
