CPU
GPU
Quadro FX 3000
Popular choices:
RADEON X700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X700 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2008). The RADEON X700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 3000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 3000.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3000 | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $15 for the Quadro FX 3000, it costs 33% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 58.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3000 | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+58.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3000 and RADEON X700
Quadro FX 3000
The Quadro FX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $3,499.
RADEON X700
The RADEON X700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 73 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 3000 scores 69 versus the RADEON X700's 73 — the RADEON X700 leads by 5.8%. The Quadro FX 3000 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the RADEON X700 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3000) vs 2,304 (RADEON X700). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3000) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (RADEON X700).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3000 | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 69 | 73+6% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 2304+860% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 11.29 TFLOPS+1715% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 144+80% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3000 | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3000) vs 3 MB (RADEON X700) — the RADEON X700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3000 | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3000 draws 189W versus the RADEON X700's 175W — a 7.7% difference. The RADEON X700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3000) vs 350W (RADEON X700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3000 | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 175W-7% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 3000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the RADEON X700 launched at $149 and now averages $10. The RADEON X700 costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.6 (Quadro FX 3000) vs 7.3 (RADEON X700) — the RADEON X700 offers 58.7% better value. The RADEON X700 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3000 | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.6 | 7.3+59% |
| Codename | GT200B | Navi 22 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | June 9 2021 |
| Ranking | #815 | #90 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 3000 and RADEON X700
