Quadro FX 3000 vs Radeon HD 2350

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3000 vs Radeon HD 2350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3000 vs Radeon HD 2350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3000

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (69 vs 77).
❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 2350

2012

Why buy it

✅+11.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 2350 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 11.6% in PassMark G3D (77 vs 69), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 3000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 2350 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 2350 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 3000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 3000 vs Radeon HD 2350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3000

The Quadro FX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 2350

The Radeon HD 2350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 77 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 3000 scores 69 versus the Radeon HD 2350's 77 — the Radeon HD 2350 leads by 11.6%. The Quadro FX 3000 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 2350 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3000) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 2350). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3000) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2350).

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	Radeon HD 2350
G3D Mark Score	69	77+12%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	1792+647%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	2.867 TFLOPS+361%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	112+40%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	Radeon HD 2350
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3000 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2350. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 3000) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 2350) — the Radeon HD 2350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	Radeon HD 2350
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3000 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 2350's 200W — a 5.7% difference. The Quadro FX 3000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3000) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	Radeon HD 2350
TDP	189W-6%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	1mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	0.4	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 3000 came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 2350 launched at $50. On MSRP, Quadro FX 3000 was 100+% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro FX 3000) vs 1.5 (Radeon HD 2350) — the Quadro FX 3000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 2350 (2012 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	Radeon HD 2350
MSRP	$0-100%	$50
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	1.5
Codename	GT200B	Tahiti
Release	November 11 2008	January 31 2012
Ranking	#815	#454

Search Quadro FX 3000 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 2350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.