Quadro FX 3000 vs Radeon 3100
Quadro FX 3000
Popular choices:
Radeon 3100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 3100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 3100 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The Radeon 3100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 3000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 3100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 3000.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3000 | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+7.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 3000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $30 for the Radeon 3100, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 86.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3000 | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+86.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3000 and Radeon 3100
Quadro FX 3000
The Quadro FX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Radeon 3100
The Radeon 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 74 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 3000 scores 69 versus the Radeon 3100's 74 — the Radeon 3100 leads by 7.2%. The Quadro FX 3000 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon 3100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3000) vs 512 (Radeon 3100). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3000) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3100).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3000 | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 69 | 74+7% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 512+113% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 1.247 TFLOPS+100% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3000 | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 3000 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 3100 has 512 MB. The Radeon 3100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 3000) vs 512 KB (Radeon 3100) — the Radeon 3100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3000 | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3000 draws 189W versus the Radeon 3100's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon 3100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3000) vs 350W (Radeon 3100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3000 | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 50W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 1.5+275% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 3000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon 3100 launched at $199 and now averages $30. The Quadro FX 3000 costs 50% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.6 (Quadro FX 3000) vs 2.5 (Radeon 3100) — the Quadro FX 3000 offers 84% better value. The Radeon 3100 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3000 | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-50% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.6+84% | 2.5 |
| Codename | GT200B | Polaris 23 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #815 | #757 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 3000 and Radeon 3100
