Quadro FX 3000 vs Radeon 3100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3000 vs Radeon 3100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3000 vs Radeon 3100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3000

2008

Why buy it

✅1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.

Radeon 3100

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Quadro FX 3000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 3100 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 3000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 3100 instead at 74 vs 69, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 3100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 3100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro FX 3000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro FX 3000 vs Radeon 3100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3000

The Quadro FX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon 3100

The Radeon 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 74 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 3000 scores 69 versus the Radeon 3100's 74 — the Radeon 3100 leads by 7.2%. The Quadro FX 3000 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon 3100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3000) vs 512 (Radeon 3100). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3000) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3100).

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	Radeon 3100
G3D Mark Score	69	74+7%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	55 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	240	512+113%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	1.247 TFLOPS+100%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+150%	32
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	Radeon 3100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3000 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 3100 carries 512 MB. Radeon 3100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3000 and 64-bit on the Radeon 3100. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 3000) vs 512 KB (Radeon 3100) — the Radeon 3100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	Radeon 3100
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3000 draws 189W versus the Radeon 3100's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon 3100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3000) vs 350W (Radeon 3100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	Radeon 3100
TDP	189W	50W-74%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	0.4	1.5+275%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 3000 came in at $0, while the Radeon 3100 launched at $199. On MSRP, Quadro FX 3000 was 100+% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro FX 3000) vs 0.4 (Radeon 3100) — the Quadro FX 3000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 3100 (2019 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	Radeon 3100
MSRP	$0-100%	$199
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	0.4
Codename	GT200B	Polaris 23
Release	November 11 2008	May 13 2019
Ranking	#815	#757

Search Quadro FX 3000 on Amazon

Search Radeon 3100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.