Quadro FX 3000 vs RADEON X700 SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3000 vs RADEON X700 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3000 vs RADEON X700 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3000

2008

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌152% higher power demand at 189W vs 75W.

RADEON X700 SE

2023

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 75W instead of 189W, a 114W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON X700 SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (71 vs 69), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON X700 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 55nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2008. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON X700 SE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro FX 3000 vs RADEON X700 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3000

The Quadro FX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $3,499.

RADEON X700 SE

The RADEON X700 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3000 scores 69 and the RADEON X700 SE reaches 71 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3000 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the RADEON X700 SE uses RDNA 3.0, both on 55 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3000) vs 1,792 (RADEON X700 SE). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3000) vs 15.77 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 SE).

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	RADEON X700 SE
G3D Mark Score	69	71+3%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	55 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	240	1792+647%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	15.77 TFLOPS+2435%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	80	112+40%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	RADEON X700 SE
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3000 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X700 SE carries 128 MB. Quadro FX 3000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3000 and 64-bit on the RADEON X700 SE. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3000) vs 2 MB (RADEON X700 SE) — the RADEON X700 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	RADEON X700 SE
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB+100%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3000 draws 189W versus the RADEON X700 SE's 75W — a 86.4% difference. The RADEON X700 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3000) vs 350W (RADEON X700 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	RADEON X700 SE
TDP	189W	75W-60%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	1mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	0.4	0.9+125%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 3000 came in at $0, while the RADEON X700 SE launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro FX 3000) vs Infinity (RADEON X700 SE) — the RADEON X700 SE offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X700 SE (2023 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	RADEON X700 SE
MSRP	$0	$0
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	Infinity
Codename	GT200B	Navi 33
Release	November 11 2008	January 4 2023
Ranking	#815	#139

Search Quadro FX 3000 on Amazon

Search RADEON X700 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.