GeForce 8400M GT vs Quadro FX 3000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8400M GT vs Quadro FX 3000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8400M GT vs Quadro FX 3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8400M GT

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 33W instead of 189W, a 156W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 3000

2008

Why buy it

✅2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌472.7% higher power demand at 189W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 3000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3% in PassMark G3D (69 vs 67), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 8400M GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 8400M GT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro FX 3000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 8400M GT vs Quadro FX 3000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8400M GT

The GeForce 8400M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.

Quadro FX 3000

The Quadro FX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8400M GT scores 67 and the Quadro FX 3000 reaches 69 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8400M GT is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 3000 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3000). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3000).

Feature	GeForce 8400M GT	Quadro FX 3000
G3D Mark Score	67	69+3%
Architecture	Maxwell	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS+39%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	16	80+400%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 8400M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 3000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 8400M GT	Quadro FX 3000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400M GT and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3000) — the GeForce 8400M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 8400M GT	Quadro FX 3000
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 9_0a (Quadro FX 3000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 8400M GT	Quadro FX 3000
DirectX	10.0+11%	9_0a
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8400M GT draws 33W versus the Quadro FX 3000's 189W — a 140.5% difference. The GeForce 8400M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3000). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce 8400M GT	Quadro FX 3000
TDP	33W-83%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	2.0+400%	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 8400M GT came in at $50, while the Quadro FX 3000 launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro FX 3000 was 100+% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs Infinity (Quadro FX 3000) — the Quadro FX 3000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 8400M GT (2014 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 8400M GT	Quadro FX 3000
MSRP	$50	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	1.3	Infinity
Codename	GM108	GT200B
Release	March 12 2014	November 11 2008
Ranking	#854	#815

Search GeForce 8400M GT on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 3000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.