GeForce 8400M GT vs Mobility Radeon HD 4225

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400M GT

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 8400M GT vs Mobility Radeon HD 4225 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8400M GT vs Mobility Radeon HD 4225: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8400M GT

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 103% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

2010

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 8400M GT is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (67 vs 66), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 8400M GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8400M GT makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 103% (1.3 vs 0.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 8400M GT vs Mobility Radeon HD 4225 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400M GT

The GeForce 8400M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 66 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8400M GT scores 67 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 reaches 66 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8400M GT is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4225). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4225).

FeatureGeForce 8400M GTMobility Radeon HD 4225
G3D Mark Score
67+2%
66
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS
1.12 TFLOPS+30%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
16
40+150%
L1 Cache
192 KB+140%
80 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 8400M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GTMobility Radeon HD 4225
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 8400M GT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 carries 512 MB. Mobility Radeon HD 4225 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400M GT and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4225. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) — the GeForce 8400M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GTMobility Radeon HD 4225
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8400M GT draws 33W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4225's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 8400M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4225). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GTMobility Radeon HD 4225
TDP
33W-34%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
2.0+54%
1.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 8400M GT came in at $50, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce 8400M GT was 50% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 0.7 (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) — the GeForce 8400M GT offers 85.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 8400M GT (2014 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce 8400M GTMobility Radeon HD 4225
MSRP
$50-50%
$100
Performance per Dollar
1.3+86%
0.7
Codename
GM108
Broadway
Release
March 12 2014
January 7 2010
Ranking
#854
#846

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.