GeForce 8400M GT vs RADEON X800 PRO

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400M GT

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON X800 PRO

2020Core: 1700 MHzBoost: 2105 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 8400M GT vs RADEON X800 PRO Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8400M GT vs RADEON X800 PRO FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8400M GT vs RADEON X800 PRO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8400M GT

2014

Why buy it

  • 96.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $349 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 722.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Draws 33W instead of 250W, a 217W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON X800 PRO

2020

Why buy it

  • GeForce 8400M GT is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X800 PRO is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 8400M GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 698% HIGHER MSRP
    $399 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 657.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 8400M GT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 96.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.1% in PassMark G3D (67 vs 65), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON X800 PRO is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, 60 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8400M GT makes the most sense to buy today. It is $349 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 722.6% (1.3 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 8400M GT is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON X800 PRO has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 8400M GT vs RADEON X800 PRO Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400M GT

The GeForce 8400M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.

AMD

RADEON X800 PRO

The RADEON X800 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 65 points. Launch price was $579.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8400M GT scores 67 and the RADEON X800 PRO reaches 65 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8400M GT is built on Maxwell while the RADEON X800 PRO uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 3,840 (RADEON X800 PRO). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 PRO). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 2105 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GTRADEON X800 PRO
G3D Mark Score
67+3%
65
Architecture
Maxwell
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
384
3840+900%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS
16.17 TFLOPS+1773%
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
2105 MHz+87%
ROPs
8
96+1100%
TMUs
16
240+1400%
L1 Cache
192 KB
768 KB+300%
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 8400M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X800 PRO leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GTRADEON X800 PRO
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400M GT and 64-bit on the RADEON X800 PRO. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 4 MB (RADEON X800 PRO) — the RADEON X800 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GTRADEON X800 PRO
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8400M GT draws 33W versus the RADEON X800 PRO's 250W — a 153.4% difference. The GeForce 8400M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 350W (RADEON X800 PRO). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GTRADEON X800 PRO
TDP
33W-87%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
2.0+567%
0.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 8400M GT came in at $50, while the RADEON X800 PRO launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce 8400M GT was 87.5% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 0.2 (RADEON X800 PRO) — the GeForce 8400M GT offers 550% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X800 PRO (2020 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce 8400M GTRADEON X800 PRO
MSRP
$50-87%
$399
Performance per Dollar
1.3+550%
0.2
Codename
GM108
Navi 21
Release
March 12 2014
October 28 2020
Ranking
#854
#65

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.