GeForce 8400 SE
VS
GeForce 8400M GT

GeForce 8400 SE vs GeForce 8400M GT

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400 SE

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 8400M GT

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8400 SE is positioned at rank 680 and the GeForce 8400M GT is on rank 682, so the GeForce 8400 SE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400 SE

#670
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
7983%
#672
7237%
#673
7218%
#677
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
6563%
#678
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
6518%
#680
GeForce 8400 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#681
GeForce 9650M GS
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
100%
#682
GeForce 8400M GT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $30
99%
#683
Mobility Radeon HD 3410
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
95%
#684
GeForce 9200M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
95%
#685
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
90%
#686
GeForce 9300M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
87%
#687
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
MSRP: $79|Avg: $1
84%
#688
GeForce 6150 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
81%
#689
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $50
78%
#690
GeForce 9450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
77%
#691
GeForce 9800 GX2
MSRP: $599|Avg: $75
75%
#692
GeForce 7900 GS
MSRP: $259|Avg: $50
74%
#693
MOBILITY RADEON X600
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
74%
#694
Mobility Radeon X2300 HD
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
72%
#695
Mobility Radeon HD 4250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
72%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400M GT

#672
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
8102%
#674
7345%
#675
7325%
#679
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
6661%
#680
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
6616%
#682
GeForce 8400M GT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $30
100%
#683
GeForce 9200M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
96%
#684
Mobility Radeon HD 3410
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
96%
#685
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
91%
#686
GeForce 9300M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
88%
#687
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
MSRP: $79|Avg: $1
85%
#688
GeForce 6150 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
82%
#689
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $50
79%
#690
GeForce 9450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
78%
#691
GeForce 9800 GX2
MSRP: $599|Avg: $75
76%
#692
GeForce 7900 GS
MSRP: $259|Avg: $50
75%
#693
MOBILITY RADEON X600
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
75%
#694
Mobility Radeon HD 4250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
73%
#695
Mobility Radeon X2300 HD
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
73%
#696
Mobility Radeon X2300
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
73%
#697
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $12
72%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 8400 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8400M GT.

InsightGeForce 8400 SEGeForce 8400M GT
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 8400 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 8400 SE holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $30), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 204.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 8400 SEGeForce 8400M GT
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+204.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8400 SE and GeForce 8400M GT

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400 SE

The GeForce 8400 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 68 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400M GT

The GeForce 8400M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8400 SE scores 68 and the GeForce 8400M GT reaches 67 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8400 SE is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 8400M GT uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 384 (GeForce 8400M GT). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M GT). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 8400 SEGeForce 8400M GT
G3D Mark Score
68+1%
67
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS
0.8632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1124 MHz
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
16
16
L1 Cache
192 KB
192 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 8400 SEGeForce 8400M GT
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 8400 SE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8400M GT has 256 MB. The GeForce 8400 SE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce 8400 SEGeForce 8400M GT
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8400M GT). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce 8400 SEGeForce 8400M GT
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)+11%
10.0
Vulkan
N/A
None
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 8400 SE) vs No (GeForce 8400M GT). Decoder: VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 8400 SE) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 8400M GT).

FeatureGeForce 8400 SEGeForce 8400M GT
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
VP2
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8400 SE draws 33W versus the GeForce 8400M GT's 33W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 8400M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 350W (GeForce 8400M GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce 8400 SEGeForce 8400M GT
TDP
33W
33W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
168mm
0mm
Height
69mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
2.1+5%
2.0
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 8400 SE launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce 8400M GT launched at $50 and now averages $30. The GeForce 8400 SE costs 66.7% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.8 (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 2.2 (GeForce 8400M GT) — the GeForce 8400 SE offers 209.1% better value.

FeatureGeForce 8400 SEGeForce 8400M GT
MSRP
$50
$50
Avg Price (30d)
$10-67%
$30
Performance per Dollar
6.8+209%
2.2
Codename
GM108
GM108
Release
March 17 2014
March 12 2014
Ranking
#850
#854