GeForce 8400 SE vs GeForce 8400M GT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8400 SE vs GeForce 8400M GT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8400 SE vs GeForce 8400M GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8400 SE

2014

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce 8400M GT

2014

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 8400 SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (68 vs 67), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 8400 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 8400 SE makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $50 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1.5% (1.4 vs 1.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 8400 SE vs GeForce 8400M GT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8400 SE

The GeForce 8400 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 68 points.

GeForce 8400M GT

The GeForce 8400M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8400 SE scores 68 and the GeForce 8400M GT reaches 67 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8400 SE is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 8400M GT uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 384 (GeForce 8400M GT). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M GT). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 8400 SE	GeForce 8400M GT
G3D Mark Score	68+1%	67
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS	0.8632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1124 MHz	1124 MHz
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	16	16
L1 Cache	192 KB	192 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 8400 SE	GeForce 8400M GT
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 8400 SE has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8400M GT carries 256 MB. GeForce 8400 SE gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400 SE and 128-bit on the GeForce 8400M GT.

Feature	GeForce 8400 SE	GeForce 8400M GT
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8400M GT). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce 8400 SE	GeForce 8400M GT
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)+11%	10.0
Vulkan	N/A	None
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 8400 SE) vs No (GeForce 8400M GT). Decoder: VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 8400 SE) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 8400M GT).

Feature	GeForce 8400 SE	GeForce 8400M GT
Encoder	None	No
Decoder	VP2	PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8400 SE draws 33W versus the GeForce 8400M GT's 33W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 8400M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 350W (GeForce 8400M GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce 8400 SE	GeForce 8400M GT
TDP	33W	33W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	168mm	0mm
Height	69mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	2.1+5%	2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 8400 SE came in at $50, while the GeForce 8400M GT launched at $50. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 1.3 (GeForce 8400M GT) — the GeForce 8400 SE offers 7.7% better value.

Feature	GeForce 8400 SE	GeForce 8400M GT
MSRP	$50	$50
Performance per Dollar	1.4+8%	1.3
Codename	GM108	GM108
Release	March 17 2014	March 12 2014
Ranking	#850	#854

Search GeForce 8400 SE on Amazon

Search GeForce 8400M GT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.