
GeForce 8400 SE

Radeon X1550
GeForce 8400 SE vs Radeon X1550 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8400 SE vs Radeon X1550 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 8400 SE vs Radeon X1550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8400 SE
2014Why buy it
- ✅1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon X1550
2017Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 8400 SE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8400 SE vs Radeon X1550 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8400 SE
The GeForce 8400 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 68 points.

Radeon X1550
The Radeon X1550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8400 SE scores 68 and the Radeon X1550 reaches 67 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8400 SE is built on Maxwell while the Radeon X1550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 512 (Radeon X1550). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon X1550). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 SE | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 68+1% | 67 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 1.211 TFLOPS+40% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1183 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 32+100% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 8400 SE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1550 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 SE | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400 SE and 64-bit on the Radeon X1550. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon X1550) — the GeForce 8400 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 SE | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 SE | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0)+23% | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 8400 SE) vs Avivo (Radeon X1550). Decoder: VP2 vs Avivo.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 SE | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Avivo |
| Decoder | VP2 | Avivo |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8400 SE draws 33W versus the Radeon X1550's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 8400 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 350W (Radeon X1550). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 SE | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-34% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.1+62% | 1.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 8400 SE came in at $50, while the Radeon X1550 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon X1550 was 100+% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GeForce 8400 SE) vs Infinity (Radeon X1550) — the Radeon X1550 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1550 (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 8400 SE | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM108 | Lexa |
| Release | March 17 2014 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #850 | #668 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














