GeForce 8400M GT
Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi
GeForce 8400M GT vs Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8400M GT vs Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce 8400M GT vs Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8400M GT
2014Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (67 vs 73).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌2% HIGHER MSRP$50 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi
2009Why buy it
- ✅+9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 11.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8400M GT vs Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce 8400M GT
The GeForce 8400M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.
Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi
The Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 73 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8400M GT scores 67 versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi's 73 — the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi leads by 9%. The GeForce 8400M GT is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi).
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 67 | 73+9% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 0.88 TFLOPS+2% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 40+150% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+20% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 8400M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8400M GT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi carries 512 MB. Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400M GT and 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi) — the GeForce 8400M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8400M GT) vs UVD 2.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi).
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8400M GT draws 33W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 30W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0 | 2.4+20% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 8400M GT came in at $50, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi launched at $49. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi was 2% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 1.5 (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi) — the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi offers 15.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 8400M GT (2014 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $49-2% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.3 | 1.5+15% |
| Codename | GM108 | M98 |
| Release | March 12 2014 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #854 | #927 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 8400M GT and Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi
