GeForce 8400M GT vs GeForce Go 7400

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400M GT

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7400

2014Core: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 8400M GT vs GeForce Go 7400 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8400M GT vs GeForce Go 7400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8400M GT vs GeForce Go 7400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8400M GT

2014

Why buy it

  • 96.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 33W instead of 64W, a 31W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce Go 7400

2014

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 8400M GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 93.9% higher power demand at 64W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 8400M GT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 96.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (67 vs 66), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 8400M GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8400M GT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 8400M GT vs GeForce Go 7400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400M GT

The GeForce 8400M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7400

The GeForce Go 7400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 66 points. Launch price was $89.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8400M GT scores 67 and the GeForce Go 7400 reaches 66 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8400M GT is built on Maxwell while the GeForce Go 7400 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 384 (GeForce Go 7400). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7400).

FeatureGeForce 8400M GTGeForce Go 7400
G3D Mark Score
67+2%
66
Architecture
Maxwell
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS+13%
0.7626 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
16
32+100%
L1 Cache
192 KB+500%
32 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 8400M GTGeForce Go 7400
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400M GT and 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7400. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce Go 7400) — the GeForce 8400M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GTGeForce Go 7400
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7400). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GTGeForce Go 7400
DirectX
10.0+11%
9.0c
Vulkan
None
None
OpenGL
3.3+57%
2.1
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8400M GT) vs No (GeForce Go 7400). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7400).

FeatureGeForce 8400M GTGeForce Go 7400
Encoder
No
No
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
PureVideo
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8400M GT draws 33W versus the GeForce Go 7400's 64W — a 63.9% difference. The GeForce 8400M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7400). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GTGeForce Go 7400
TDP
33W-48%
64W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
2.0+100%
1.0