
GeForce 8400M GT

Radeon 3100
GeForce 8400M GT vs Radeon 3100 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8400M GT vs Radeon 3100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 8400M GT vs Radeon 3100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8400M GT
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 260.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 3100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon 3100
2019Why buy it
- ✅1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅GeForce 8400M GT is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 3100 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌298% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8400M GT vs Radeon 3100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8400M GT
The GeForce 8400M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.

Radeon 3100
The Radeon 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 74 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8400M GT scores 67 versus the Radeon 3100's 74 — the Radeon 3100 leads by 10.4%. The GeForce 8400M GT is built on Maxwell while the Radeon 3100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 512 (Radeon 3100). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3100). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1218 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 67 | 74+10% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 1.247 TFLOPS+44% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1218 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 32+100% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 8400M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 3100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8400M GT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 3100 carries 512 MB. Radeon 3100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400M GT and 64-bit on the Radeon 3100. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon 3100) — the GeForce 8400M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8400M GT draws 33W versus the Radeon 3100's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 8400M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 350W (Radeon 3100). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-34% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0+33% | 1.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 8400M GT came in at $50, while the Radeon 3100 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce 8400M GT was 74.9% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 0.4 (Radeon 3100) — the GeForce 8400M GT offers 225% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 3100 (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-75% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.3+225% | 0.4 |
| Codename | GM108 | Polaris 23 |
| Release | March 12 2014 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #854 | #757 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














