
Quadro FX 3000

RADEON X700 PRO
Quadro FX 3000 vs RADEON X700 PRO Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX 3000 vs RADEON X700 PRO FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX 3000 vs RADEON X700 PRO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX 3000
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 189W instead of 260W, a 71W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 170mm, a 169mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (69 vs 76).
- ❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
RADEON X700 PRO
2023Why buy it
- ✅+10.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌37.6% higher power demand at 260W vs 189W.
- ❌16900% longer card at 170mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 3000 vs RADEON X700 PRO Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3000
The Quadro FX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $3,499.

RADEON X700 PRO
The RADEON X700 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 27 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1287 MHz to 2245 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 76 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 3000 scores 69 versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 76 — the RADEON X700 PRO leads by 10.1%. The Quadro FX 3000 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the RADEON X700 PRO uses RDNA 3.0, both on 55 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3000) vs 5,120 (RADEON X700 PRO). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3000) vs 45.98 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 PRO).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3000 | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 69 | 76+10% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 5120+2033% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 45.98 TFLOPS+7291% |
| ROPs | 32 | 160+400% |
| TMUs | 80 | 320+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 6 MB+2300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3000 | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3000 and 64-bit on the RADEON X700 PRO. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3000) vs 6 MB (RADEON X700 PRO) — the RADEON X700 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3000 | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 6 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0a (Quadro FX 3000) vs 9_0b (RADEON X700 PRO). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3000 | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0a | 9_0b |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3000 draws 189W versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 260W — a 31.6% difference. The Quadro FX 3000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3000) vs 350W (RADEON X700 PRO). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 170mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3000 | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W-27% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | 170mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4+33% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro FX 3000 came in at $0, while the RADEON X700 PRO launched at $179. On MSRP, Quadro FX 3000 was 100+% cheaper ($179 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro FX 3000) vs 0.4 (RADEON X700 PRO) — the Quadro FX 3000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X700 PRO (2023 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3000 | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $179 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.4 |
| Codename | GT200B | Navi 31 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | July 27 2023 |
| Ranking | #815 | #29 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














