Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi vs Quadro FX 3000

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi

2009Core: 550 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3000

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi vs Quadro FX 3000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi vs Quadro FX 3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi

2009

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 30W instead of 189W, a 159W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 3000

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 530% higher power demand at 189W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5.8% in PassMark G3D (73 vs 69), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a newer 2009 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi vs Quadro FX 3000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi

The Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 73 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3000

The Quadro FX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi scores 73 versus the Quadro FX 3000's 69 — the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi leads by 5.8%. The Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi is built on TeraScale while the Quadro FX 3000 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3000). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3000).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4300 SerisiQuadro FX 3000
G3D Mark Score
73+6%
69
Architecture
TeraScale
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
55 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
800+233%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.88 TFLOPS+41%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
80+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4300 SerisiQuadro FX 3000
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3000 carries 256 MB. Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3000.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4300 SerisiQuadro FX 3000
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi) vs 9_0a (Quadro FX 3000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4300 SerisiQuadro FX 3000
DirectX
10.1+12%
9_0a
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi draws 30W versus the Quadro FX 3000's 189W — a 145.2% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4300 SerisiQuadro FX 3000
TDP
30W-84%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
2.4+500%
0.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi came in at $49, while the Quadro FX 3000 launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro FX 3000 was 100+% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi) vs Infinity (Quadro FX 3000) — the Quadro FX 3000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi (2009 vs 2008).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4300 SerisiQuadro FX 3000
MSRP
$49
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
1.5
Infinity
Codename
M98
GT200B
Release
January 9 2009
November 11 2008
Ranking
#927
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.