
Mobility Radeon 4100 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi

Mobility Radeon 4100
Popular choices:

Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon 4100 is positioned at rank 666 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi is on rank 673, so the Mobility Radeon 4100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon 4100
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon 4100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 11% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon 4100 | Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+11%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-11%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $49), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 341.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon 4100 | Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+341.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon 4100 and Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi

Mobility Radeon 4100
The Mobility Radeon 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points.

Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi
The Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 73 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon 4100 scores 81 versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi's 73 — the Mobility Radeon 4100 leads by 11%. The Mobility Radeon 4100 is built on TeraScale while the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi uses TeraScale, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon 4100 | Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 81+11% | 73 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS | 0.88 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon 4100 | Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon 4100 | Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon 4100 | Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs UVD 2.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi). Decoder: UVD 2 vs UVD 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon 4100 | Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | UVD 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon 4100 draws 30W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi's 30W — a 0% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 80.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon 4100 | Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | 80-11% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.7+13% | 2.4 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon 4100 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi launched at $49 and now averages $10. The Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi costs 79.6% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.7 (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 7.3 (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi) — the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi offers 329.4% better value.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon 4100 | Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | $49 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $10-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.7 | 7.3+329% |
| Codename | M98 | M98 |
| Release | January 9 2009 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #927 | #927 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















