Mobility Radeon 4100 vs Radeon X1650 Pro

AMD

Mobility Radeon 4100

2009Core: 550 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon X1650 Pro

2023Boost: 2581 MHz

Mobility Radeon 4100 vs Radeon X1650 Pro Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon 4100 vs Radeon X1650 Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon 4100

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $51 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 94.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 250W, a 220W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon X1650 Pro

2023

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 104.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 733.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon X1650 Pro is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.9% in PassMark G3D (85 vs 81), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1650 Pro is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2009. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon 4100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 94.5% (1.7 vs 0.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon 4100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon X1650 Pro has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon 4100 vs Radeon X1650 Pro Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon 4100

The Mobility Radeon 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points.

AMD

Radeon X1650 Pro

The Radeon X1650 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points. Launch price was $549.

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon 4100 scores 81 and the Radeon X1650 Pro reaches 85 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon 4100 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon X1650 Pro uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 Pro).

FeatureMobility Radeon 4100Radeon X1650 Pro
G3D Mark Score
81
85+5%
Architecture
TeraScale
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
55 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
800
2560+220%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
40
160+300%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling + RSR

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon 4100Radeon X1650 Pro
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon 4100 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1650 Pro.

FeatureMobility Radeon 4100Radeon X1650 Pro
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon 4100 draws 30W versus the Radeon X1650 Pro's 250W — a 157.1% difference. The Mobility Radeon 4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 Pro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureMobility Radeon 4100Radeon X1650 Pro
TDP
30W-88%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
90
Perf/Watt
2.7+800%
0.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon 4100 came in at $49, while the Radeon X1650 Pro launched at $100. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon 4100 was 51% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 0.8 (Radeon X1650 Pro) — the Mobility Radeon 4100 offers 112.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1650 Pro (2023 vs 2009).

FeatureMobility Radeon 4100Radeon X1650 Pro
MSRP
$49-51%
$100
Performance per Dollar
1.7+112%
0.8
Codename
M98
Navi 22
Release
January 9 2009
October 17 2023
Ranking
#927
#92

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.