Mobility Radeon 4100 vs Radeon HD 3200

AMD

Mobility Radeon 4100

2009Core: 550 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 3200

2011Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Mobility Radeon 4100 vs Radeon HD 3200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon 4100 vs Radeon HD 3200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon 4100

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $1 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 186W, a 156W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 3200

2011

Why buy it

  • More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 2% HIGHER MSRP
    $50 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • 520% higher power demand at 186W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 3200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (82 vs 81), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Mobility Radeon 4100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon 4100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.8% (1.7 vs 1.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HD 3200 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Mobility Radeon 4100 vs Radeon HD 3200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon 4100

The Mobility Radeon 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 3200

The Radeon HD 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points. Launch price was $180.

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon 4100 scores 81 and the Radeon HD 3200 reaches 82 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon 4100 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon HD 3200 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 3200). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3200).

FeatureMobility Radeon 4100Radeon HD 3200
G3D Mark Score
81
82+1%
Architecture
TeraScale
TeraScale 3
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
800
1280+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.88 TFLOPS
1.92 TFLOPS+118%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
80+100%
L1 Cache
160 KB
320 KB+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon 4100Radeon HD 3200
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon 4100 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3200. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 3200) — the Radeon HD 3200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMobility Radeon 4100Radeon HD 3200
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 3200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureMobility Radeon 4100Radeon HD 3200
DirectX
10.1
10.0
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs UVD (Radeon HD 3200). Decoder: UVD 2 vs UVD.

FeatureMobility Radeon 4100Radeon HD 3200
Encoder
None
UVD
Decoder
UVD 2
UVD
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon 4100 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 3200's 186W — a 144.4% difference. The Mobility Radeon 4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureMobility Radeon 4100Radeon HD 3200
TDP
30W-84%
186W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
1mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
90
Perf/Watt
2.7+575%
0.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon 4100 came in at $49, while the Radeon HD 3200 launched at $50. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon 4100 was 2% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 1.6 (Radeon HD 3200) — the Mobility Radeon 4100 offers 6.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 3200 (2011 vs 2009).

FeatureMobility Radeon 4100Radeon HD 3200
MSRP
$49-2%
$50
Performance per Dollar
1.7+6%
1.6
Codename
M98
Cayman
Release
January 9 2009
December 1 2011
Ranking
#927
#598

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.