Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi vs Radeon HD 2350

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi

2009Core: 550 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 2350

2012Boost: 1250 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi vs Radeon HD 2350 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi vs Radeon HD 2350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $1 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 2350

2012

Why buy it

  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 2350 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5.5% in PassMark G3D (77 vs 73), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 2350 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 more expensive on MSRP at $50 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3.4% (1.5 vs 1.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 2350 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi vs Radeon HD 2350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi

The Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 73 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 2350

The Radeon HD 2350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 77 points. Launch price was $449.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi scores 73 versus the Radeon HD 2350's 77 — the Radeon HD 2350 leads by 5.5%. The Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi is built on TeraScale while the Radeon HD 2350 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 2350). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2350).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4300 SerisiRadeon HD 2350
G3D Mark Score
73
77+5%
Architecture
TeraScale
GCN 1.0
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
800
1792+124%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.88 TFLOPS
2.867 TFLOPS+226%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
112+180%
L1 Cache
160 KB
448 KB+180%
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4300 SerisiRadeon HD 2350
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 2350 carries 256 MB. Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2350. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 2350) — the Radeon HD 2350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4300 SerisiRadeon HD 2350
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 2350's 200W — a 147.8% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4300 SerisiRadeon HD 2350
TDP
30W-85%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
2.4+500%
0.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi came in at $49, while the Radeon HD 2350 launched at $50. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi was 2% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi) vs 1.5 (Radeon HD 2350) — the Radeon HD 2350 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 2350 (2012 vs 2009).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4300 SerisiRadeon HD 2350
MSRP
$49-2%
$50
Performance per Dollar
1.5
1.5
Codename
M98
Tahiti
Release
January 9 2009
January 31 2012
Ranking
#927
#454

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.