
GeForce 7350 LE vs Quadro FX 3000

GeForce 7350 LE
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 3000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 7350 LE is positioned at rank #618 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7350 LE
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 7350 LE is significantly newer (2020 vs 2008). The GeForce 7350 LE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 3000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 7350 LE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 3000.
| Insight | GeForce 7350 LE | Quadro FX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+7.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7.2%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 7350 LE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $15 for the Quadro FX 3000, it costs 33% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 60.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 7350 LE | Quadro FX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+60.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 7350 LE and Quadro FX 3000

GeForce 7350 LE
The GeForce 7350 LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 74 points.

Quadro FX 3000
The Quadro FX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 7350 LE scores 74 versus the Quadro FX 3000's 69 — the GeForce 7350 LE leads by 7.2%. The GeForce 7350 LE is built on Pascal while the Quadro FX 3000 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3000). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3000).
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | Quadro FX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 74+7% | 69 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+167% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.199 TFLOPS+93% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | Quadro FX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 7350 LE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3000 has 256 MB. The GeForce 7350 LE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 3000) — the GeForce 7350 LE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | Quadro FX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 9_0a (Quadro FX 3000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | Quadro FX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9_0a |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 7350 LE draws 20W versus the Quadro FX 3000's 189W — a 161.7% difference. The GeForce 7350 LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3000). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | Quadro FX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-89% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7+825% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 7350 LE launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Quadro FX 3000 launched at $0 and now averages $15. The GeForce 7350 LE costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.4 (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 4.6 (Quadro FX 3000) — the GeForce 7350 LE offers 60.9% better value. The GeForce 7350 LE is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | Quadro FX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-33% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.4+61% | 4.6 |
| Codename | GP107 | GT200B |
| Release | February 10 2020 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #597 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











