
GeForce 7350 LE vs GeForce 9300 SE

GeForce 7350 LE
Popular choices:

GeForce 9300 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 7350 LE is positioned at rank 618 and the GeForce 9300 SE is on rank 668, so the GeForce 7350 LE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7350 LE
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300 SE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 7350 LE uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce 7350 LE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9300 SE lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9300 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 10.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 7350 LE.
| Insight | GeForce 7350 LE | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-10.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+10.8%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9300 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $10 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 10.8% better value per dollar than the GeForce 7350 LE.
| Insight | GeForce 7350 LE | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+10.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 7350 LE and GeForce 9300 SE

GeForce 7350 LE
The GeForce 7350 LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 74 points.

GeForce 9300 SE
The GeForce 9300 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 7350 LE scores 74 versus the GeForce 9300 SE's 82 — the GeForce 9300 SE leads by 10.8%. The GeForce 7350 LE is built on Pascal while the GeForce 9300 SE uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 384 (GeForce 9300 SE). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300 SE). Boost clocks: 937 MHz vs 941 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 74 | 82+11% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.199 TFLOPS+66% | 0.7227 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 937 MHz | 941 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB+25% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9300 SE) — the GeForce 9300 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9300 SE). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 11.1 (10_0)+23% |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3+57% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 7350 LE) vs None (GeForce 9300 SE). Decoder: PureVideo (VP1) vs PureVideo HD (VP3). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9 (GeForce 7350 LE) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9300 SE).
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo (VP1) | PureVideo HD (VP3) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 7350 LE draws 20W versus the GeForce 9300 SE's 33W — a 49.1% difference. The GeForce 7350 LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 350W (GeForce 9300 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 167mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-39% | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 167mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65-19% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7+48% | 2.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 7350 LE launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce 9300 SE launched at $50 and now averages $10. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.4 (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 8.2 (GeForce 9300 SE) — the GeForce 9300 SE offers 10.8% better value. The GeForce 7350 LE is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-40% | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.4 | 8.2+11% |
| Codename | GP107 | GM108 |
| Release | February 10 2020 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #597 | #810 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











