
GeForce 7350 LE vs Radeon X1650 GTO

GeForce 7350 LE
Popular choices:

Radeon X1650 GTO
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 7350 LE is positioned at rank 618 and the Radeon X1650 GTO is on rank 352, so the Radeon X1650 GTO offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7350 LE
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1650 GTO
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1650 GTO is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 7350 LE.
| Insight | GeForce 7350 LE | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 7350 LE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $20 for the Radeon X1650 GTO, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 97.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 7350 LE | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+97.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 7350 LE and Radeon X1650 GTO

GeForce 7350 LE
The GeForce 7350 LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 74 points.

Radeon X1650 GTO
The Radeon X1650 GTO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 75 points. Launch price was $1,099.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 7350 LE scores 74 and the Radeon X1650 GTO reaches 75 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 7350 LE is built on Pascal while the Radeon X1650 GTO uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 5,120 (Radeon X1650 GTO). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon X1650 GTO). Boost clocks: 937 MHz vs 2324 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 74 | 75+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 5120+700% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.199 TFLOPS | 23.8 TFLOPS+1885% |
| Boost Clock | 937 MHz | 2324 MHz+148% |
| ROPs | 16 | 128+700% |
| TMUs | 32 | 320+900% |
| L1 Cache | 0.23 MB | 1 MB+335% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 4 MB (Radeon X1650 GTO) — the Radeon X1650 GTO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 7350 LE draws 20W versus the Radeon X1650 GTO's 335W — a 177.5% difference. The GeForce 7350 LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 GTO). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-94% | 335W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7+1750% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 7350 LE launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon X1650 GTO launched at $150 and now averages $20. The GeForce 7350 LE costs 50% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.4 (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 3.8 (Radeon X1650 GTO) — the GeForce 7350 LE offers 94.7% better value. The Radeon X1650 GTO is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-80% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-50% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.4+95% | 3.8 |
| Codename | GP107 | Navi 21 |
| Release | February 10 2020 | May 10 2022 |
| Ranking | #597 | #25 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















