
GeForce 7350 LE vs RADEON X700

GeForce 7350 LE
Popular choices:

RADEON X700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 7350 LE is positioned at rank 618 and the RADEON X700 is on rank 354, so the RADEON X700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7350 LE
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 7350 LE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X700.
| Insight | GeForce 7350 LE | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 7350 LE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $10 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1.4% better value per dollar than the RADEON X700.
| Insight | GeForce 7350 LE | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 7350 LE and RADEON X700

GeForce 7350 LE
The GeForce 7350 LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 74 points.

RADEON X700
The RADEON X700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 73 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 7350 LE scores 74 and the RADEON X700 reaches 73 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 7350 LE is built on Pascal while the RADEON X700 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 2,304 (RADEON X700). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (RADEON X700). Boost clocks: 937 MHz vs 2450 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 74+1% | 73 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 2304+260% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.199 TFLOPS | 11.29 TFLOPS+842% |
| Boost Clock | 937 MHz | 2450 MHz+161% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 144+350% |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 512 KB+113% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 7350 LE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X700 has 256 MB. The GeForce 7350 LE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 3 MB (RADEON X700) — the RADEON X700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 7350 LE draws 20W versus the RADEON X700's 175W — a 159% difference. The GeForce 7350 LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 350W (RADEON X700). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-89% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 167mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7+825% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 7350 LE launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the RADEON X700 launched at $149 and now averages $10. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.4 (GeForce 7350 LE) vs 7.3 (RADEON X700) — the GeForce 7350 LE offers 1.4% better value. The RADEON X700 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce 7350 LE | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-80% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.4+1% | 7.3 |
| Codename | GP107 | Navi 22 |
| Release | February 10 2020 | June 9 2021 |
| Ranking | #597 | #90 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











