Quadro FX 3000 vs GeForce 8400 SE

CPU

GPU

Quadro FX 3000

2008Core: 610 MHz

GeForce 8400 SE

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

+1.5%

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

0.0%

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400 SE

#670

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

7983%

#672

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

7237%

#673

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

7218%

#677

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

6563%

#678

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

6518%

#680

GeForce 8400 SE

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

100%

#681

GeForce 9650M GS

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

100%

#682

GeForce 8400M GT

MSRP: $50|Avg: $30

99%

#683

Mobility Radeon HD 3410

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

95%

#684

GeForce 9200M GS

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

95%

#685

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

90%

#686

GeForce 9300M GS

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

87%

#687

Mobility Radeon HD 2400

MSRP: $79|Avg: $1

84%

#688

GeForce 6150 LE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $10

81%

#689

Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2

MSRP: $449|Avg: $50

78%

#690

GeForce 9450

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

77%

#691

GeForce 9800 GX2

MSRP: $599|Avg: $75

75%

#692

GeForce 7900 GS

MSRP: $259|Avg: $50

74%

#693

MOBILITY RADEON X600

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

74%

#694

Mobility Radeon X2300 HD

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

72%

#695

Mobility Radeon HD 4250

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

72%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce 8400 SE is significantly newer (2014 vs 2008). The GeForce 8400 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 3000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 3000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 8400 SE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro FX 3000	GeForce 8400 SE
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 8400 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 8400 SE holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 47.8% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro FX 3000	GeForce 8400 SE
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+47.8%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15)	✅More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 3000 Benchmark Check

GeForce 8400 SE Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3000 and GeForce 8400 SE

Quadro FX 3000

The Quadro FX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $3,499.

GeForce 8400 SE

The GeForce 8400 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 68 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3000 scores 69 and the GeForce 8400 SE reaches 68 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3000 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 8400 SE uses Maxwell, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3000) vs 384 (GeForce 8400 SE). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3000) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400 SE).

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	GeForce 8400 SE
G3D Mark Score	69+1%	68
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Maxwell
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	384+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	0.8632 TFLOPS+39%
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	80+400%	16
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	GeForce 8400 SE
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3000 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8400 SE has 512 MB. The GeForce 8400 SE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3000) vs 1 MB (GeForce 8400 SE) — the GeForce 8400 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	GeForce 8400 SE
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9_0a (Quadro FX 3000) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 8400 SE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	GeForce 8400 SE
DirectX	9_0a	11.1 (10_0)+23%
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3000 draws 189W versus the GeForce 8400 SE's 33W — a 140.5% difference. The GeForce 8400 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3000) vs 350W (GeForce 8400 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Quadro FX 3000	GeForce 8400 SE
TDP	189W	33W-83%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	1mm	168mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	—	85
Perf/Watt	0.4	2.1+425%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 3000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce 8400 SE launched at $50 and now averages $10. The GeForce 8400 SE costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.6 (Quadro FX 3000) vs 6.8 (GeForce 8400 SE) — the GeForce 8400 SE offers 47.8% better value. The GeForce 8400 SE is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2008).