CPU
GPU
RADEON X600 PRO
Popular choices:
RADEON X700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON X600 PRO is positioned at rank 341 and the RADEON X700 is on rank 354, so the RADEON X600 PRO offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X600 PRO
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON X600 PRO offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON X600 PRO | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $10 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 9% better value per dollar than the RADEON X600 PRO.
| Insight | RADEON X600 PRO | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+9%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X600 PRO and RADEON X700
RADEON X600 PRO
The RADEON X600 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.
RADEON X700
The RADEON X700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 73 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON X600 PRO scores 67 versus the RADEON X700's 73 — the RADEON X700 leads by 9%. The RADEON X600 PRO is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RADEON X700 uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (RADEON X600 PRO) vs 2,304 (RADEON X700). Raw compute: 6.39 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 PRO) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (RADEON X700). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2450 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X600 PRO | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 67 | 73+9% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2304+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.39 TFLOPS | 11.29 TFLOPS+77% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2450 MHz+57% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 144+13% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X600 PRO | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X600 PRO comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X700 has 256 MB. The RADEON X600 PRO offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | RADEON X600 PRO | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X600 PRO draws 150W versus the RADEON X700's 175W — a 15.4% difference. The RADEON X600 PRO is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X600 PRO) vs 350W (RADEON X700). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON X600 PRO | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-14% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 65mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X600 PRO launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the RADEON X700 launched at $149 and now averages $10. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.7 (RADEON X600 PRO) vs 7.3 (RADEON X700) — the RADEON X700 offers 9% better value. The RADEON X700 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | RADEON X600 PRO | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-34% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.7 | 7.3+9% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Navi 22 |
| Release | January 21 2020 | June 9 2021 |
| Ranking | #216 | #90 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON X600 PRO and RADEON X700
