
RADEON X600 PRO
Popular choices:

RADEON X700 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON X600 PRO is positioned at rank #341 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X600 PRO
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X700 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON X600 PRO offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON X600 PRO | RADEON X700 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X700 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $10 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 6% better value per dollar than the RADEON X600 PRO.
| Insight | RADEON X600 PRO | RADEON X700 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+6%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X600 PRO and RADEON X700 SE

RADEON X600 PRO
The RADEON X600 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.

RADEON X700 SE
The RADEON X700 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON X600 PRO scores 67 versus the RADEON X700 SE's 71 — the RADEON X700 SE leads by 6%. The RADEON X600 PRO is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RADEON X700 SE uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RADEON X600 PRO) vs 1,792 (RADEON X700 SE). Raw compute: 6.39 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 PRO) vs 15.77 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 SE). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2200 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X600 PRO | RADEON X700 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 67 | 71+6% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+14% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.39 TFLOPS | 15.77 TFLOPS+147% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2200 MHz+41% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128+14% | 112 |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X600 PRO | RADEON X700 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X600 PRO comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X700 SE has 128 MB. The RADEON X600 PRO offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (RADEON X600 PRO) vs 2 MB (RADEON X700 SE) — the RADEON X600 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X600 PRO | RADEON X700 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X600 PRO draws 150W versus the RADEON X700 SE's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The RADEON X700 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X600 PRO) vs 350W (RADEON X700 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON X600 PRO | RADEON X700 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 65mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 0.9+125% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X600 PRO launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the RADEON X700 SE launched at $0 and now averages $10. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.7 (RADEON X600 PRO) vs 7.1 (RADEON X700 SE) — the RADEON X700 SE offers 6% better value. The RADEON X700 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | RADEON X600 PRO | RADEON X700 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.7 | 7.1+6% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Navi 33 |
| Release | January 21 2020 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #216 | #139 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















