Quadro FX 550 vs RADEON X600 PRO

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 550 vs RADEON X600 PRO FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 550 vs RADEON X600 PRO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 550

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RADEON X600 PRO across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
51.5% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

RADEON X600 PRO

2020

Why buy it

✅100.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 58.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Quadro FX 550 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X600 PRO is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON X600 PRO is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 100.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.7% in PassMark G3D (67 vs 64), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON X600 PRO is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON X600 PRO makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 58.6% (0.7 vs 0.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro FX 550 vs RADEON X600 PRO Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 550

The Quadro FX 550 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 64 points. Launch price was $3,499.

RADEON X600 PRO

The RADEON X600 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 550 scores 64 and the RADEON X600 PRO reaches 67 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 550 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the RADEON X600 PRO uses RDNA 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 550) vs 2,048 (RADEON X600 PRO). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 550) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 PRO).

Feature	Quadro FX 550	RADEON X600 PRO
G3D Mark Score	64	67+5%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	240	2048+753%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	6.39 TFLOPS+927%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	80	128+60%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	3 MB+1100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 550	RADEON X600 PRO
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 550 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X600 PRO carries 512 MB. RADEON X600 PRO gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 550 and 64-bit on the RADEON X600 PRO. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 550) vs 3 MB (RADEON X600 PRO) — the RADEON X600 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 550	RADEON X600 PRO
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	3 MB+1100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 550 draws 189W versus the RADEON X600 PRO's 150W — a 23% difference. The RADEON X600 PRO is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 550) vs 350W (RADEON X600 PRO). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	Quadro FX 550	RADEON X600 PRO
TDP	189W	150W-21%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	—	170mm
Height	—	65mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	0.3	0.4+33%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 550 came in at $150, while the RADEON X600 PRO launched at $99. On MSRP, RADEON X600 PRO was 34% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (Quadro FX 550) vs 0.7 (RADEON X600 PRO) — the RADEON X600 PRO offers 75% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X600 PRO (2020 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 550	RADEON X600 PRO
MSRP	$150	$99-34%
Performance per Dollar	0.4	0.7+75%
Codename	GT200B	Navi 10
Release	November 11 2008	January 21 2020
Ranking	#815	#216

Search Quadro FX 550 on Amazon

Search RADEON X600 PRO on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.