GeForce Go 7400 vs RADEON X600 PRO
GeForce Go 7400
Popular choices:
RADEON X600 PRO
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 7400 is positioned at rank 310 and the RADEON X600 PRO is on rank 341, so the GeForce Go 7400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7400
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X600 PRO
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X600 PRO is significantly newer (2020 vs 2014). The RADEON X600 PRO likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce Go 7400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X600 PRO is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 7400.
| Insight | GeForce Go 7400 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON X600 PRO remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 7400 and RADEON X600 PRO
GeForce Go 7400
The GeForce Go 7400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 66 points. Launch price was $89.
RADEON X600 PRO
The RADEON X600 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce Go 7400 scores 66 and the RADEON X600 PRO reaches 67 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7400 is built on Kepler while the RADEON X600 PRO uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 7400) vs 2,048 (RADEON X600 PRO). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7400) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 PRO).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 66 | 67+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2048+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS | 6.39 TFLOPS+738% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 7400 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X600 PRO has 512 MB. The RADEON X600 PRO offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce Go 7400) vs 3 MB (RADEON X600 PRO) — the RADEON X600 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 7400) vs None (RADEON X600 PRO). Decoder: PureVideo vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7400) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 (RADEON X600 PRO).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo | MPEG-2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 | MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 7400 draws 64W versus the RADEON X600 PRO's 150W — a 80.4% difference. The GeForce Go 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7400) vs 350W (RADEON X600 PRO). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W-57% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 170mm |
| Height | 0mm | 65mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.0+150% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X600 PRO is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $99 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $10 |
| Codename | GK107 | Navi 10 |
| Release | May 29 2014 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #777 | #216 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce Go 7400 and RADEON X600 PRO
