GeForce Go 7400 vs Radeon X1650 SE

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7400

2014Core: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon X1650 SE

2023Boost: 2581 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce Go 7400 vs Radeon X1650 SE Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 7400 vs Radeon X1650 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 7400 vs Radeon X1650 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 7400

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 64W instead of 250W, a 186W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon X1650 SE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon X1650 SE

2023

Why buy it

  • 100.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 290.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon X1650 SE is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 100.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 7.6% in PassMark G3D (71 vs 66), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1650 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon X1650 SE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce Go 7400 vs Radeon X1650 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7400

The GeForce Go 7400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 66 points. Launch price was $89.

AMD

Radeon X1650 SE

The Radeon X1650 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points. Launch price was $549.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 7400 scores 66 versus the Radeon X1650 SE's 71 — the Radeon X1650 SE leads by 7.6%. The GeForce Go 7400 is built on Kepler while the Radeon X1650 SE uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 7400) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 SE).

FeatureGeForce Go 7400Radeon X1650 SE
G3D Mark Score
66
71+8%
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
384
2560+567%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
32
160+400%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 7400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1650 SE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce Go 7400Radeon X1650 SE
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 7400 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1650 SE carries 512 MB. Radeon X1650 SE gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7400 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1650 SE.

FeatureGeForce Go 7400Radeon X1650 SE
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7400) vs 9.0c (Radeon X1650 SE). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce Go 7400Radeon X1650 SE
DirectX
9.0c
9.0c
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 7400) vs Avivo (Radeon X1650 SE). Decoder: PureVideo vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7400) vs MPEG-2,WMV9 (Radeon X1650 SE).

FeatureGeForce Go 7400Radeon X1650 SE
Encoder
No
Avivo
Decoder
PureVideo
Avivo
Codecs
MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264
MPEG-2,WMV9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7400 draws 64W versus the Radeon X1650 SE's 250W — a 118.5% difference. The GeForce Go 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7400) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce Go 7400Radeon X1650 SE
TDP
64W-74%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
1.0+233%
0.3
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon X1650 SE (2023 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce Go 7400Radeon X1650 SE
MSRP
$0
Codename
GK107
Navi 22
Release
May 29 2014
October 17 2023
Ranking
#777
#92

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.