
GeForce Go 7400

Radeon X1650 SE
GeForce Go 7400 vs Radeon X1650 SE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce Go 7400 vs Radeon X1650 SE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce Go 7400 vs Radeon X1650 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce Go 7400
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 64W instead of 250W, a 186W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon X1650 SE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon X1650 SE
2023Why buy it
- ✅100.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌290.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 64W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce Go 7400 vs Radeon X1650 SE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 7400
The GeForce Go 7400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 66 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon X1650 SE
The Radeon X1650 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 7400 scores 66 versus the Radeon X1650 SE's 71 — the Radeon X1650 SE leads by 7.6%. The GeForce Go 7400 is built on Kepler while the Radeon X1650 SE uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 7400) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 SE).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 66 | 71+8% |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2560+567% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 160+400% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce Go 7400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1650 SE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 7400 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1650 SE carries 512 MB. Radeon X1650 SE gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7400 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1650 SE.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7400) vs 9.0c (Radeon X1650 SE). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 7400) vs Avivo (Radeon X1650 SE). Decoder: PureVideo vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7400) vs MPEG-2,WMV9 (Radeon X1650 SE).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | Avivo |
| Decoder | PureVideo | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 | MPEG-2,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 7400 draws 64W versus the Radeon X1650 SE's 250W — a 118.5% difference. The GeForce Go 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7400) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W-74% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.0+233% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon X1650 SE (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | GK107 | Navi 22 |
| Release | May 29 2014 | October 17 2023 |
| Ranking | #777 | #92 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














