GeForce Go 7400 vs Quadro FX 3000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 7400 vs Quadro FX 3000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 7400 vs Quadro FX 3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 7400

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 64W instead of 189W, a 125W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 3000

2008

Why buy it

✅100.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌195.3% higher power demand at 189W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 3000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 100.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.5% in PassMark G3D (69 vs 66), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce Go 7400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 3000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 3000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce Go 7400 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce Go 7400 vs Quadro FX 3000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 7400

The GeForce Go 7400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 66 points. Launch price was $89.

Quadro FX 3000

The Quadro FX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce Go 7400 scores 66 and the Quadro FX 3000 reaches 69 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7400 is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 3000 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 7400) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3000). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7400) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3000).

Feature	GeForce Go 7400	Quadro FX 3000
G3D Mark Score	66	69+5%
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7626 TFLOPS+23%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	80+150%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 7400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 3000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce Go 7400	Quadro FX 3000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7400 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3000.

Feature	GeForce Go 7400	Quadro FX 3000
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7400) vs 9_0a (Quadro FX 3000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce Go 7400	Quadro FX 3000
DirectX	9.0c	9_0a
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7400 draws 64W versus the Quadro FX 3000's 189W — a 98.8% difference. The GeForce Go 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7400) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3000). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce Go 7400	Quadro FX 3000
TDP	64W-66%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	1.0+150%	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce Go 7400 (2014 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce Go 7400	Quadro FX 3000
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	GK107	GT200B
Release	May 29 2014	November 11 2008
Ranking	#777	#815

Search GeForce Go 7400 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 3000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.